Complications, Compliance, and 3-Year Outcomes After Endolaserless Vitrectomy With Aflibercept Monotherapy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy-Related Vitreous Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To report the 3-year outcomes for endolaserless vitrectomy with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) monotherapy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR)-related vitreous hemorrhage (VH). MATERIALS AND METHOD: Eyes underwent endolaserless vitrectomy and received one preoperative and intraoperative IAI followed by randomization to a q8week or q16week IAI group. Additional IAI was administered as needed. RESULTS: 31/40 eyes were randomized (14 q8week eyes, 17 q16week eyes). Through 152 weeks, q8week and q16week eyes received 18.6 and 12.1 IAI, respectively. Q8week eyes observed a 34 letter visual acuity (VA) increase (P = 0.003) compared to a 27 letter increase in the q16week group (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Endolaserless vitrectomy with aflibercept monotherapy for PDR-related VH provides significant long-term visual gains. Frequent IAI is required for fewer proliferative consequences. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:89-96.].

A Phase I, Single Ascending Dose Study of GEM103 (Recombinant Human Complement Factor H) in Patients with Geographic Atrophy.

Purpose: To establish the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of an intravitreal injection of recombinant human complement factor H (CFH), GEM103, in individuals with genetically defined age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and geographic atrophy (GA). Design: Phase I single ascending-dose, open-label clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04246866). Participants: Twelve individuals 50 years of age or older with a confirmed diagnosis of foveal GA in the study eye. Methods: Participants were assigned to the increasing dose cohorts and received 1 50-µl intravitreal injection of GEM103 at doses of 50 µg/eye, 100 µg/eye, 250 µg/eye, or 500 µg/eye; dose escalation was dependent on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities. Main Outcome Measures: Safety assessments included ocular and systemic adverse events (AEs), ocular examinations, clinical laboratory and vital signs, and serum antidrug antibody levels. Biomarkers, measured in the aqueous humor (AH), included CFH and complement activation biomarkers factor Ba and complement component 3a. Results: No dose-limiting toxicities were reported, enabling escalation to the maximum study dose. No anti-GEM103 antidrug antibodies were detected during the study. Four participants experienced AEs; these were nonserious, mild or moderate in severity, and unrelated to GEM103. The AEs in 2 of these participants were related to the intravitreal injection procedure. No clinically significant ophthalmic changes and no ocular inflammation were observed. Visual acuity was maintained and stable throughout the 8-week follow-up period. No choroidal neovascularization occurred. CFH levels increased in a dose-dependent manner after GEM103 administration with supraphysiological levels observed at week 1; levels were more than baseline for 8 weeks or more in all participants receiving single doses of 100 µg or more. Complement activation biomarkers were reduced 7 days after dose administration. Conclusions: A single intravitreal administration of GEM103 (up to 500 µg/eye) was well tolerated in individuals with GA. Of the few mild or moderate AEs reported, none were determined to be related to GEM103. No intraocular inflammation or choroidal neovascularization developed. CFH levels in AH were increased and stable for 8 weeks, with pharmacodynamic data suggesting that GEM103 restored complement regulation. These results support further development in a repeat-dose trial in patients with GA with AMD.

Association of Predominantly Peripheral Lesions on Ultra-Widefield Imaging and the Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy Worsening Over Time.

Importance: Ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging improves the ability to identify peripheral diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions compared with standard imaging. Whether detection of predominantly peripheral lesions (PPLs) better predicts rates of disease worsening over time is unknown. Objective: To determine whether PPLs identified on UWF imaging are associated with increased disease worsening beyond the risk associated with baseline Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study conducted at 37 US and Canadian sites with 388 participants enrolled between February and December 2015. At baseline and annually through 4 years, 200° UWF-color images were obtained and graded for DRSS at a reading center. Baseline UWF-color and UWF-fluorescein angiography (FA) images were evaluated for the presence of PPL. Data were analyzed from May 2020 to June 2022. Interventions: Treatment of DR or diabetic macular edema was at investigator discretion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Predominantly peripheral lesions were defined as DR lesions with a greater extent outside vs inside the 7 standard ETDRS fields. Primary outcome was disease worsening defined as worsening 2 steps or more on the DRSS or receipt of DR treatment. Analyses were adjusted for baseline DRSS score and correlation between 2 study eyes of the same participant. Results: Data for 544 study eyes with nonproliferative DR (NPDR) were analyzed (182 [50%] female participants; median age, 62 years; 68% White). The 4-year disease worsening rates were 45% for eyes with baseline mild NPDR, 40% for moderate NPDR, 26% for moderately severe NPDR, and 43% for severe NPDR. Disease worsening was not associated with color PPL at baseline (present vs absent: 38% vs 43%; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57-1.08; P = .13) but was associated with FA PPL at baseline (present vs absent: 50% vs 31%; HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.25-2.36; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Although no association was identified with color PPL, presence of FA PPL was associated with greater risk of disease worsening over 4 years, independent of baseline DRSS score. These results suggest that use of UWF-FA to evaluate retinas peripheral to standard ETDRS fields may improve the ability to predict disease worsening in NPDR eyes. These findings support use of UWF-FA for future DR staging systems and clinical care to more accurately determine prognosis in NPDR eyes.

Association of Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography-Identified Retinal Nonperfusion and the Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy Worsening Over Time.

Importance: Presence of predominantly peripheral diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions on ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA) was associated with greater risk of DR worsening or treatment over 4 years. Whether baseline retinal nonperfusion assessment is additionally predictive of DR disease worsening is unclear. Objective: To assess whether the extent and location of retinal nonperfusion identified on UWF-FA are associated with worsening in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score or DR treatment over time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study with data for 508 eyes with nonproliferative DR and gradable nonperfusion on UWF-FA at baseline. All images were graded at a centralized reading center; 200° ultra-widefield (UWF) color images were graded for DR at baseline and annually for 4 years. Baseline 200° UWF-FA images were graded for nonperfused area, nonperfusion index (NPI), and presence of predominantly peripheral lesions on UWF-FA (FA PPL). Interventions: Treatment of DR or diabetic macular edema was at investigator discretion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Association of baseline UWF-FA nonperfusion extent with disease worsening, defined as either 2 or more steps of DRSS worsening within Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study fields on UWF-color images or receipt of DR treatment. Results: After adjusting for baseline DRSS, the risk of disease worsening over 4 years was higher in eyes with greater overall NPI (hazard ratio [HR] for 0.1-unit increase, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.21; P = .02) and NPI within the posterior pole (HR for 0.1-unit increase, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.17-1.56; P < .001) and midperiphery (HR for 0.1-unit increase, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.16; P = .04). In a multivariable analysis adjusting for baseline DRSS score and baseline systemic risk factors, greater NPI (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22; P = .02) and presence of FA PPL (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.35-2.65; P < .001) remained associated with disease worsening. Conclusions and Relevance: This 4-year longitudinal study has demonstrated that both greater baseline retinal nonperfusion and FA PPL on UWF-FA are associated with higher risk of disease worsening, even after adjusting for baseline DRSS score and known systemic risk. These associations between disease worsening and retinal nonperfusion and FA PPL support the increased use of UWF-FA to complement color fundus photography in future efforts for DR prognosis, clinical care, and research.

Aflibercept Monotherapy or Bevacizumab First for Diabetic Macular Edema.

BACKGROUND: In eyes with diabetic macular edema, the relative efficacy of administering aflibercept monotherapy as compared with bevacizumab first with a switch to aflibercept if the eye condition does not improve sufficiently (a form of step therapy) is unclear. METHODS: At 54 clinical sites, we randomly assigned eyes in adults who had diabetic macular edema involving the macular center and a visual-acuity letter score of 24 to 69 (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better visual acuity; Snellen equivalent, 20/320 to 20/50) to receive either 2.0 mg of intravitreous aflibercept or 1.25 mg of intravitreous bevacizumab. The drug was administered at randomization and thereafter according to the prespecified retreatment protocol. Beginning at 12 weeks, eyes in the bevacizumab-first group were switched to aflibercept therapy if protocol-specified criteria were met. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity over the 2-year trial period. Retinal central subfield thickness and visual acuity at 2 years and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 312 eyes (in 270 adults) underwent randomization; 158 eyes were assigned to receive aflibercept monotherapy and 154 to receive bevacizumab first. Over the 2-year period, 70% of the eyes in the bevacizumab-first group were switched to aflibercept therapy. The mean improvement in visual acuity was 15.0 letters in the aflibercept-monotherapy group and 14.0 letters in the bevacizumab-first group (adjusted difference, 0.8 letters; 95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 2.5; P = 0.37). At 2 years, the mean changes in visual acuity and retinal central subfield thickness were similar in the two groups. Serious adverse events (in 52% of the patients in the aflibercept-monotherapy group and in 36% of those in the bevacizumab-first group) and hospitalizations for adverse events (in 48% and 32%, respectively) were more common in the aflibercept-monotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial of treatment of moderate vision loss due to diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula, we found no evidence of a significant difference in visual outcomes over a 2-year period between aflibercept monotherapy and treatment with bevacizumab first with a switch to aflibercept in the case of suboptimal response. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; Protocol AC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03321513.).

Optical coherence tomography angiography and Humphrey visual field in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine if obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) predisposes patients to glaucoma and macular disease due to vascular compromise by evaluating retinal and optic nerve vasculature and function using optical coherence tomography angiography and Humphrey visual field testing, respectively. METHODS: In this prospective, observational, cross-sectional study 45 patients undergoing polysomnography ordered per standard of care were selected and stratified based on apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Medical history, visual acuity testing, 24-2 Humphrey visual field, intraocular pressure measurement, and optical coherence tomography angiography studies of the macular and peripapillary retina were obtained. Correlations between polysomnography parameters and imaging data were analyzed. RESULTS: The radial peripapillary capillary vascular density demonstrated no relationship to AHI (95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.026,0.038]) or severity of OSAS (95% CI: [-0.772, 3.648]) for moderate OSAS compared to mild/normal and (-1.295, 3.1421) for severe compared to mild/normal. Optical coherence tomography angiography superficial parafoveal vascular density (95% CI: [-0.068,0.011], deep parafoveal vascular density (95% CI: [-0.080,0.009]), and foveal avascular zone (95% CI: [-0.001, 0.001]) showed no statistically significant relationship to AHI or OSAS severity after controlling for confounders. Optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fiber layer thickness increased with AHI (P = .014), but there was no statistically significant correlation with OSAS severity with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (95% CI: [-12.543, 6.792] for moderate comparing to normal and [-2.883, 16.551] for severe comparing to normal). Visual field parameters were unaffected by OSAS (95% CI: mean deviation [-0.21,0.29], pattern standard deviation: [-0.351, 0.121], visual field index: [-0.166, 0.329]). Optical coherence tomography choroidal thickness showed a statistically significant decrease when OSAS was grouped by severity (P = .0092) but did not correlate with AHI (P = .129, 95% CI: [-1.210, 0.095]). CONCLUSIONS: The severity of OSAS did not show a statistically significant effect on parameters associated with glaucoma or macular vascular disease. Larger cohorts may be required to determine the physiologic consequences of OSAS on the macular and optic nerve vasculature, structure, and function. CITATION: Davanian A, Williamson L, Taylor C, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography and Humphrey visual field in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 2022;18(9):2133-2142.

Refill-Exchange Procedure of the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab: Overview and Clinical Trial Experience.

PURPOSE: To describe the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab refill-exchange procedure. METHODS: Procedure based on the clinical trial program in patients with retinal diseases. RESULTS: The refill-exchange procedure is performed under topical anesthesia and strict aseptic conditions. Supplemental task lighting and magnification are recommended throughout the procedure. Ranibizumab is aseptically transferred from the vial with the filter needle and air is removed from the syringe. The filter needle is then replaced with the refill needle; any remaining air is removed from the syringe and the plunger is advanced to the 0.1-mL mark. Targeting the implant septum center, the refill needle is inserted perpendicularly to the globe until the soft stop contacts the conjunctiva (perpendicular orientation and conjunctival contact are maintained throughout the procedure); a cotton-tipped applicator is recommended for globe stabilization. The entire syringe contents are slowly injected over 5-10 seconds while existing solution fills the fluid collection reservoir. Once completed, the needle is carefully withdrawn while maintaining perpendicularity. The procedure can be successfully performed in rare, specific cases, including subconjunctival thickening or fibrous capsule formation, fluid-filled bleb formation, and corneal patch grafts. CONCLUSION: The procedure is straightforward but distinct from intravitreal injections and requires adherence to standardized techniques. With appropriate preparation, the procedure can be performed in specific cases. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:257-265.].

Effect of Intravitreous Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor vs Sham Treatment for Prevention of Vision-Threatening Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy: The Protocol W Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for the management of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) without center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) has not been clearly established. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of intravitreous aflibercept injections compared with sham treatment in preventing potentially vision-threatening complications in eyes with moderate to severe NPDR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data for this study were collected between January 15, 2016, and May 28, 2020, from the ongoing DRCR Retina Network Protocol W randomized clinical trial, conducted at 64 US and Canadian sites among 328 adults (399 eyes) with moderate to severe NPDR (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study severity level, 43-53), without CI-DME. Analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. INTERVENTIONS: Eyes were randomly assigned to 2.0 mg of aflibercept injections (n = 200) or sham (n = 199) given at baseline; 1, 2, and 4 months; and every 4 months through 2 years. Between 2 and 4 years, treatment was deferred if the eye had mild NPDR or better. Aflibercept was administered in both groups if CI-DME with vision loss (≥10 letters at 1 visit or 5-9 letters at 2 consecutive visits) or high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) developed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Development of CI-DME with vision loss or PDR through May 2020, when the last 2-year visit was completed. RESULTS: Among the 328 participants (57.6% men [230 of 399 eyes]; mean [SD] age, 56 [11] years), the 2-year cumulative probability of developing CI-DME with vision loss or PDR was 16.3% with aflibercept vs 43.5% with sham. The overall hazard ratio for either outcome was 0.32 (97.5% CI, 0.21-0.50; P < .001), favoring aflibercept. The 2-year cumulative probability of developing PDR was 13.5% in the aflibercept group vs 33.2% in the sham group, and the 2-year cumulative probability of developing CI-DME with vision loss was 4.1% in the aflibercept group vs 14.8% in the sham group. The mean (SD) change in visual acuity from baseline to 2 years was -0.9 (5.8) letters with aflibercept and -2.0 (6.1) letters with sham (adjusted mean difference, 0.5 letters [97.5% CI, -1.0 to 1.9 letters]; P = .47). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, among eyes with moderate to severe NPDR, the proportion of eyes that developed PDR or vision-reducing CI-DME was lower with periodic aflibercept compared with sham treatment. However, through 2 years, preventive treatment did not confer visual acuity benefit compared with observation plus treatment with aflibercept only after development of PDR or vision-reducing CI-DME. The 4-year results will be important to assess longer-term visual acuity outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02634333.

The Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Results from the Randomized Phase 2 Ladder Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treatment. DESIGN: Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, active treatment-controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with nAMD within 9 months who had received 2 or more prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injections and were responsive to treatment. METHODS: Patients were randomized 3:3:3:2 to receive the PDS filled with ranibizumab 10 mg/ml, 40 mg/ml, 100 mg/ml, or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to first implant refill assessed when the last enrolled patient completed the month 9 visit (primary efficacy end point), improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT), and safety. RESULTS: The primary analysis population was 220 patients, with 58, 62, 59, and 41 patients in the PDS 10-mg/ml, PDS 40-mg/ml, PDS 100-mg/ml, and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg arms, respectively. Median time to first implant refill was 8.7, 13.0, and 15.0 months in the PDS 10-mg/ml, PDS 40-mg/ml, and PDS 100-mg/ml arms, respectively. At month 9, the adjusted mean BCVA change from baseline was ‒3.2 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, ‒0.5 ETDRS letters, +5.0 ETDRS letters, and +3.9 ETDRS letters in the PDS 10-mg/ml, PDS 40-mg/ml, PDS 100-mg/ml, and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg arms, respectively. At month 9, the adjusted mean CFT change from baseline was similar in the PDS 100-mg/ml and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg arms. The optimized PDS implant insertion and refill procedures were generally well tolerated. After surgical procedure optimization, postoperative vitreous hemorrhage rate was 4.5% (7/157; 1 event classified as serious). There was no evidence of implant clogging. CONCLUSIONS: In the phase 2 Ladder trial, the PDS was generally well tolerated and demonstrated a dose response across multiple end points in patients with nAMD. The PDS 100-mg/ml arm showed visual and anatomic outcomes comparable with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections but with a reduced total number of ranibizumab treatments. The PDS has the potential to reduce treatment burden in nAMD while maintaining vision.

Factors Associated With Visual Acuity and Central Subfield Thickness Changes When Treating Diabetic Macular Edema With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: An Exploratory Analysis of the Protocol T Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Identifying the factors that are associated with the magnitude of treatment benefits from anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME) may help refine treatment expectations. Objective: To identify the baseline factors that are associated with vision and anatomic outcomes when managing DME with anti-VEGF and determine if there are interactions between factors and the agent administered. Design, Setting, and Participants: This post hoc analysis of data from the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network multicenter randomized clinical trial , Protocol T, was conducted between December 2016 and December 2017. Between August 22, 2012, and August 28, 2013, 660 participants were enrolled with central-involved DME and vision impairment (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/32-20/320). Interventions: Repeated 0.05-mL intravitreous injections of 2.0-mg aflibercept (201 eyes), 1.25-mg bevacizumab (185 eyes), or 0.3-mg ranibizumab (192 eyes) per protocol. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in visual acuity (VA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield thickness at 2 years and change in VA over 2 years (area under the curve [AUC]). Results: Among 578 participants, the median age (interquartile range) was 61 (54-67) years. Across anti-VEGF treatment groups, each baseline factor was associated with mean improvement in VA and a reduction in central DME compared with the baseline. For every decade of participant age, the mean VA improvement was reduced by 2.1 letters (95% CI, -3.0 to -1.2; P < .001) in the VA and 1.9 letters (95% CI, -2.4 to -1.3; P < .001) in the VA AUC analyses. For each 1% increase in hemoglobin A1c levels, VA improvement was reduced by 1 letter in the VA (95% CI, -1.5 to -0.5; P < .001) and 0.5 letters (95% CI, -0.9 to -0.2; P < .001) in the VA AUC analyses. Eyes with no prior panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and less than severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy had an approximately 3-letter improvement in the VA (95% CI, 0.9-5.4; P = .007) and VA AUC (95% CI, 1.3-4.2; P < .001) analyses compared with eyes with prior PRP. On average, African American participants had greater reductions in central subfield thickness compared with eyes of white participants (-27.3 µm, P = .01), as did eyes with central subretinal fluid compared with eyes without this OCT feature (-22.9 µm, P = .01). There were no interactions between the predictive factors and the specific anti-VEGF agent that was administered for any VA or OCT outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Lower hemoglobin A1c levels were associated with the magnitude of vision improvement following anti-VEGF therapy, providing further evidence to encourage glycemic control among persons with diabetes. Younger patients and those without prior PRP might expect greater improvement in VA than older patients or those with prior PRP.

INTRAVITREAL AFLIBERCEPT INJECTION FOR CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION DUE TO PRESUMED OCULAR HISTOPLASMOSIS SYNDROME: The HANDLE Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in patients with presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome and choroidal neovascularization. METHODS: Open-label randomized Phase I/II study of IAI in patients with presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome-related choroidal neovascularization. Thirty-nine eyes from 39 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 2 groups. The Sustained Group eyes (n = 19) underwent monthly IAI for 3 months, then mandatory IAI every 2 months for 12 months (with an option for monthly PRN dosing, if needed). The PRN Group eyes (n = 20) received 1 IAI at randomization, then monthly PRN IAI for 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-nine eyes (19 eyes Sustained Group and 20 eyes PRN Group) were randomized. Average age of participants was 50 years (19-75), with 16 men and 23 women. Ten, 12, and 17 eyes demonstrated extrafoveal, juxtafoveal, and subfoveal choroidal neovascularization, respectively. All eyes in both groups received IAI at baseline, with the Sustained and PRN groups receiving on an average 7.5 (5-11) and 4.6 (1-10) injections, respectively, over the 12 months. At baseline, overall average visual acuity was 68 letters (13-87 letters) with Snellen equivalent of 20/42 (20/20-20/160). At 12-month follow-up, Sustained Group's average visual acuity was 84.9 letters (74-94) and Snellen equivalent was 20/21 (20/13-20/32), indicating an average improvement of 12 letters (6 letters loss to 36 letters gain) (P < 0.01). The PRN Group's 12-month average visual acuity was 80.9 letters (60-94) and Snellen equivalent was 20/26 (20/13-20/63), indicating an average gain of 19 letters (4-75) (P < 0.01). Mean baseline central subfield thickness (CST) was 374 µm and mean 1-year CST was 260 µm (P < 0.01) among all study participants. The Sustained Group's mean baseline CST was 383 µm and mean 12-month CST was 268 µm (P < 0.01). Mean baseline CST of the PRN Group was 360.8 µm, with the final mean CST of 260.5 µm (P < 0.01). No reported endophthalmitis, retinal tears, detachments, vitreous hemorrhage, nor adverse thrombotic events were reported. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal aflibercept resulted in improved visual and anatomical outcomes with a favorable safety profile. PRN IAI dosing required less injections with similar visual and anatomical outcomes compared with sustained dosing.

Effect of Bevacizumab vs Aflibercept on Visual Acuity Among Patients With Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: The SCORE2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Studies have established the efficacy and safety of aflibercept for the treatment of macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion. Bevacizumab is used off-label to treat this condition despite the absence of supporting data. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether bevacizumab is noninferior to aflibercept for the treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The SCORE2 randomized noninferiority clinical trial was conducted at 66 private practice or academic centers in the United States, and included 362 patients with macular edema due to central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion who were randomized 1:1 to receive aflibercept or bevacizumab. The first participant was randomized on September 17, 2014, and the last month 6 visit occurred on May 6, 2016. Analyses included data available as of December 30, 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Eyes were randomized to receive intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (1.25 mg; n = 182) or aflibercept (2.0 mg; n = 180) every 4 weeks through month 6. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was mean change in visual acuity (VA) letter score (VALS) from the randomization visit to the 6-month follow-up visit, based on the best-corrected electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study VALS (scores range from 0-100; higher scores indicate better VA). The noninferiority margin was 5 letters, and statistical testing for noninferiority was based on a 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval. RESULTS: Among 362 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 69 [12] years; 157 [43.4%] women; mean [SD] VALS at baseline, 50.3 [15.2] [approximate Snellen VA 20/100]), 348 (96.1%) completed the month 6 follow-up visit. At month 6, the mean VALS was 69.3 (a mean increase from baseline of 18.6) in the bevacizumab group and 69.3 (a mean increase from baseline of 18.9) in the aflibercept group (model-based estimate of between-group difference, -0.14; 97.5% CI, -3.07 to ∞; P = .001 for noninferiority), meeting criteria for noninferiority. Ocular adverse events in the aflibercept group included 4 participants with intraocular pressure (IOP) more than 10 mm Hg greater than baseline; ocular adverse events in the bevacizumab group included 1 participant with endophthalmitis (culture negative), 9 with IOP more than 10 mm Hg greater than baseline, 2 with IOP higher than 35 mm Hg, and 1 with angle-closure glaucoma not attributed to the study drug or procedure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with macular edema due to central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion, intravitreal bevacizumab was noninferior to aflibercept with respect to visual acuity after 6 months of treatment.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Neovascular Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy in a Predominantly Non-Asian Population: RIVAL Results.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea; Regeneron, Tarrytown, NY) injection (IAI) for the treatment of neovascular polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) in a predominantly non-Asian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, prospective, unmasked, nonrandomized clinical trial. Twenty eyes with neovascular PCV received monthly 2.0 mg IAI for 3 months followed by mandatory IAI every 2 months for 12 months. RESULTS: The mean change in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 1 year was +11 letters in the treatment-naïve group, +5 letters in the treatment non-naïve group, and +9 letters overall. There was an overall mean reduction of 70 µm from baseline central subfield thickness (CST) at 1 year. Patients received a mean of 6.2 mandatory and 0.7 additional IAI injections overall during the course of 1 year. No serious ocular adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: At 1 year, neovascular PCV in a predominantly non-Asian population treated with IAI demonstrated favorable visual, anatomic, and safety outcomes. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:34-44.].

Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Eyes With Substantial Vision Loss After Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema: Subanalysis of the VISTA and VIVID Randomized Clinical Trials.

IMPORTANCE: Information on the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) with vision loss after macular laser photocoagulation is clinically valuable. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate visual and anatomic outcomes in a subgroup of macular laser photocoagulation treatment control (hereafter laser control) eyes with substantial vision loss receiving treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This investigation was a post hoc analysis of a subgroup of laser control eyes in 2 phase 3 trials-VISTA (Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema) and VIVID (Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Vision Impairment Due to DME)-in a multicenter setting. One hundred nine laser control eyes with center-involving DME were included. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injection (2 mg) every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses with sham injections on nontreatment visits starting at week 24 was initiated on meeting prespecified criteria of at least a 10-letter visual acuity loss at 2 consecutive visits or at least a 15-letter visual acuity loss from the best previous measurement at 1 visit and vision not better than at baseline. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Visual and anatomic outcomes in a subgroup of laser control eyes receiving treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injection. RESULTS: Through week 100, a total of 63 of 154 eyes (40.9%) in VISTA and 46 of 133 eyes (34.6%) in VIVID initially randomized to laser control received treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injection. The median time from week 24 to the first intravitreal aflibercept injection treatment was 34.0 (VISTA) and 83.5 (VIVID) days. In this subgroup, the mean (SD) visual gain from baseline to week 100 was 2.2 (12.5) (VISTA) and 3.8 (10.1) (VIVID) letters. At the time of intravitreal aflibercept injection initiation, these eyes had a mean (SD) loss of 11.0 (10.1) (VISTA) and 10.0 (6.5) (VIVID) letters from baseline, and they subsequently gained a mean (SD) of 17.4 (9.7) (VISTA) and 13.6 (8.6) (VIVID) letters from the initiation of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injection through week 100. There was a minimal mean change in central subfield thickness from baseline in these eyes at the time of intravitreal aflibercept injection initiation (an increase of 3.9 µm in VISTA and a decrease of 3.0 µm in VIVID), after which further mean (SD) reductions of 285.6 (202.6) µm (VISTA) and 313.4 (181.9) µm (VIVID) occurred through week 100. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Intravitreal aflibercept injection improves visual and anatomic outcomes in eyes experiencing substantial vision loss after macular laser photocoagulation treatment for DME. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01363440 and NCT01331681.

Ranibizumab 0.3 mg for Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema After Recent, Frequent, and Chronic Bevacizumab: The ROTATE Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 0.3 mg ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) in eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) after recent, chronic, and frequent bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Open-label, prospective study of 0.3 mg ranibizumab for eyes with persistent DME after bevacizumab. Thirty eyes randomized to a sustained group or a pro re nata (PRN) dosing group. RESULTS: The mean change in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 1 year was +6.7 letters in the sustained group, +6.4 letters in the PRN group, and +6.5 letters overall. There was an overall mean reduction of 116 µm from baseline central subfield thickness at 1 year, with -92 µm and -127 µm decreases in the sustained and PRN groups, respectively. Adverse events included two deaths; one patient with multiple cardiopulmonary comorbidities, myocardial infarction, stroke, osteomyelitis; and mild posterior subcapsular cataracts in two eyes. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab 0.3 mg demonstrated improved visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with persistent DME following bevacizumab. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:1030-1037.].

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 148-Week Results from the VISTA and VIVID Studies.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema (DME) over 3 years. DESIGN: Two similarly designed phase 3 trials: VISTADME and VIVIDDME. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (eyes; n = 872) with central-involved DME. METHODS: Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or laser control. From week 24, if rescue treatment criteria were met, IAI patients received active laser, and laser control patients received IAI 2q8. From week 100, laser control patients who had not received IAI rescue treatment received IAI as needed per retreatment criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 52. We report the 148-week results. RESULTS: Mean BCVA gain from baseline to week 148 with IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser control was 10.4, 10.5, and 1.4 letters (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 10.3, 11.7, and 1.6 letters (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. The proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters from baseline at week 148 was 42.9%, 35.8%, and 13.6% (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 41.2%, 42.2%, and 18.9% (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. Greater proportions of eyes treated with IAI 2q4 and IAI 2q8 versus those treated with laser control had an improvement of ≥2 steps in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score in both VISTA (29.9% and 34.4% vs. 20.1% [P = 0.0350, IAI 2q4; P = 0.0052, IAI 2q8]) and VIVID (44.3% and 47.8% vs. 17.4% [P < 0.0001 for both]). In an integrated safety analysis, the most frequent ocular serious adverse event was cataract (3.1%, 2.1%, 0.3% for 2q4, 2q8, and control). CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvements observed with both IAI regimens (over laser control) at weeks 52 and 100 were maintained at week 148, with similar overall efficacy in the IAI 2q4 and IAI 2q8 groups. Treatment with IAI also had positive effects on the DRSS score. Over 148 weeks, the incidence of adverse events was consistent with the known safety profile of IAI.

Panretinal Photocoagulation vs Intravitreous Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is the standard treatment for reducing severe visual loss from proliferative diabetic retinopathy. However, PRP can damage the retina, resulting in peripheral vision loss or worsening diabetic macular edema (DME). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the noninferiority of intravitreous ranibizumab compared with PRP for visual acuity outcomes in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial conducted at 55 US sites among 305 adults with proliferative diabetic retinopathy enrolled between February and December 2012 (mean age, 52 years; 44% female; 52% white). Both eyes were enrolled for 89 participants (1 eye to each study group), with a total of 394 study eyes. The final 2-year visit was completed in January 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Individual eyes were randomly assigned to receive PRP treatment, completed in 1 to 3 visits (n = 203 eyes), or ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, by intravitreous injection at baseline and as frequently as every 4 weeks based on a structured re-treatment protocol (n = 191 eyes). Eyes in both treatment groups could receive ranibizumab for DME. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was mean visual acuity change at 2 years (5-letter noninferiority margin; intention-to-treat analysis). Secondary outcomes included visual acuity area under the curve, peripheral visual field loss, vitrectomy, DME development, and retinal neovascularization. RESULTS: Mean visual acuity letter improvement at 2 years was +2.8 in the ranibizumab group vs +0.2 in the PRP group (difference, +2.2; 95% CI, -0.5 to +5.0; P < .001 for noninferiority). The mean treatment group difference in visual acuity area under the curve over 2 years was +4.2 (95% CI, +3.0 to +5.4; P < .001). Mean peripheral visual field sensitivity loss was worse (-23 dB vs -422 dB; difference, 372 dB; 95% CI, 213-531 dB; P < .001), vitrectomy was more frequent (15% vs 4%; difference, 9%; 95% CI, 4%-15%; P < .001), and DME development was more frequent (28% vs 9%; difference, 19%; 95% CI, 10%-28%; P < .001) in the PRP group vs the ranibizumab group, respectively. Eyes without active or regressed neovascularization at 2 years were not significantly different (35% in the ranibizumab group vs 30% in the PRP group; difference, 3%; 95% CI, -7% to 12%; P = .58). One eye in the ranibizumab group developed endophthalmitis. No significant differences between groups in rates of major cardiovascular events were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, treatment with ranibizumab resulted in visual acuity that was noninferior to (not worse than) PRP treatment at 2 years. Although longer-term follow-up is needed, ranibizumab may be a reasonable treatment alternative, at least through 2 years, for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01489189.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 100-Week Results From the VISTA and VIVID Studies.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Two similarly designed, randomized, phase 3 trials, VISTA(DME) and VIVID(DME). PARTICIPANTS: Patients (eyes; n=872) with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus who had DME with central involvement. METHODS: Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or laser control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 52. This report presents the 100-week results including mean change from baseline in BCVA, proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters, and proportion of eyes with a ≥2-step improvement in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score. RESULTS: Mean BCVA gain from baseline to week 100 with IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser control was 11.5, 11.1, and 0.9 letters (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 11.4, 9.4, and 0.7 letters (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. The proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters from baseline at week 100 was 38.3%, 33.1%, and 13.0% (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 38.2%, 31.1%, and 12.1% (P ≤ 0.0001) in VIVID. The proportion of eyes that lost ≥15 letters at week 100 was 3.2%, 0.7%, and 9.7% (P ≤ 0.0220) in VISTA and 2.2%, 1.5%, and 12.9% (P ≤ 0.0008) in VIVID. Significantly more eyes in the IAI 2q4 and 2q8 groups versus those in the laser control group had a ≥2 step improvement in the DRSS score in both VISTA (37.0% and 37.1% vs. 15.6%; P < 0.0001) and VIVID (29.3% and 32.6% vs. 8.2%; P ≤ 0.0004). In an integrated safety analysis, the most frequent serious ocular adverse event was cataract (2.4%, 1.0%, and 0.3% for 2q4, 2q8, and control). CONCLUSIONS: In both VISTA and VIVID, the 52-week visual and anatomic superiority of IAI over laser control was sustained through week 100, with similar efficacy in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups. Safety in these studies was consistent with the known safety profile of IAI.

Microperimetric assessment of retinal sensitivity in eyes with diabetic macular edema from a phase 2 study of intravitreal aflibercept.

PURPOSE: To evaluate retinal sensitivity in patients with diabetic macular edema who received intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or laser. METHODS: A substudy included 46 patients from DA VINCI (a randomized, double-masked Phase 2 study) receiving either laser, 0.5 mg IAI every 4 weeks, 2 mg IAI every 4 weeks, 2 mg IAI every 8 weeks after 3 monthly doses (2q8), or 2 mg IAI as-needed after 3 monthly doses for 52 weeks. Retinal sensitivity was measured in one (central), five (one central and four inner), and eight (four inner and four outer) optical coherence tomography subfields. RESULTS: Mean best-corrected visual acuity improvement in the subgroup at Week 52 was 3.3 letters with laser and ranged from 5.4 to 16.3 letters in the IAI groups. Retinal sensitivity of laser patients at Week 52 was comparable with baseline in the central optical coherence tomography subfield but decreased in the five and eight optical coherence tomography subfields. Compared with laser, retinal sensitivity significantly increased with IAI in the 2q8 and pooled IAI groups in the 5 and 8 optical coherence tomography subfields at Week 52 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal aflibercept injection improved best-corrected visual acuity and retinal sensitivity in this subgroup of patients. Laser may cause a deterioration of macular function that is not detectable with best-corrected visual acuity testing.